<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Green Dotted Line</title>
	<atom:link href="http://briandrake.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://briandrake.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Collaboration consulting in a Big Four company</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 22:54:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Government 2.0 #FAIL by Failure: The Most Important, Undiscussed Element of Gov 2.0 - Generation Shift</title>
		<link>http://briandrake.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/government-2-0-fail/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Failure: The Most Important, Undiscussed Element of Gov 2.0 - Generation Shift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 22:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briandrake.wordpress.com/?p=577#comment-222</guid>
		<description>[...] NOTE: Brian Drake has a great post on this subject on his blog &#8220;The Green Dotted Line&#8221; and is organizing a Government 2.0 #Fail event to occur in the early part of 2010. So we&#8217;re [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] NOTE: Brian Drake has a great post on this subject on his blog &#8220;The Green Dotted Line&#8221; and is organizing a Government 2.0 #Fail event to occur in the early part of 2010. So we&#8217;re [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Government 2.0 #FAIL by Doug Black</title>
		<link>http://briandrake.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/government-2-0-fail/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Black</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 21:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briandrake.wordpress.com/?p=577#comment-220</guid>
		<description>Joe -- I certainly hear your point about IT security folks and their (understandable) security concerns about social media. If we want them to attend, they need to know we want to hear their concerns and engage in a serious dialogue about how to address their concerns. 

As for your comment on public affairs officers, I have to respectfully disagree, as the opposite has been my experience. My federal government clients and I have frequently found allies in Public Affairs for moving social media efforts forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe &#8212; I certainly hear your point about IT security folks and their (understandable) security concerns about social media. If we want them to attend, they need to know we want to hear their concerns and engage in a serious dialogue about how to address their concerns. </p>
<p>As for your comment on public affairs officers, I have to respectfully disagree, as the opposite has been my experience. My federal government clients and I have frequently found allies in Public Affairs for moving social media efforts forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Government 2.0 #FAIL by The Impact of Social Media in Government &#171; #SocialMedia Blog</title>
		<link>http://briandrake.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/government-2-0-fail/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>The Impact of Social Media in Government &#171; #SocialMedia Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briandrake.wordpress.com/?p=577#comment-218</guid>
		<description>[...] from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).  Then you have Brian Drake from Deloitte saying gov2.0 is not moving fast enough  and on the other side Larry Lessig who cautions too much transparency can be detrimental and all [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).  Then you have Brian Drake from Deloitte saying gov2.0 is not moving fast enough  and on the other side Larry Lessig who cautions too much transparency can be detrimental and all [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Government 2.0 #Win? by Gov 2.0: Taking a Look Back at 2009 &#124; Social Media Strategery</title>
		<link>http://briandrake.wordpress.com/2009/10/31/government-2-0-win/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>Gov 2.0: Taking a Look Back at 2009 &#124; Social Media Strategery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briandrake.wordpress.com/?p=605#comment-217</guid>
		<description>[...] to walk. From the Transparency and Open Government Memo to the planning of next year&#8217;s Mapping Success: Can Government 2.0 Work for You? conference, I, along with many members of the Gov 2.0 Community, have had an alternately successful [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to walk. From the Transparency and Open Government Memo to the planning of next year&#8217;s Mapping Success: Can Government 2.0 Work for You? conference, I, along with many members of the Gov 2.0 Community, have had an alternately successful [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Government 2.0 #Win? by briandrake</title>
		<link>http://briandrake.wordpress.com/2009/10/31/government-2-0-win/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>briandrake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briandrake.wordpress.com/?p=605#comment-215</guid>
		<description>Hey Maxine! I&#039;ve had some off-line conversations with potential presenters. I have cleared my meetings today to put together an agenda for the team to iterate upon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Maxine! I&#8217;ve had some off-line conversations with potential presenters. I have cleared my meetings today to put together an agenda for the team to iterate upon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Government 2.0 #Win? by mixtmedia</title>
		<link>http://briandrake.wordpress.com/2009/10/31/government-2-0-win/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>mixtmedia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briandrake.wordpress.com/?p=605#comment-214</guid>
		<description>Time for another planning meeting?  What&#039;s the latest scoop?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time for another planning meeting?  What&#8217;s the latest scoop?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Government 2.0 #Win? by Steve Radick</title>
		<link>http://briandrake.wordpress.com/2009/10/31/government-2-0-win/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Radick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briandrake.wordpress.com/?p=605#comment-210</guid>
		<description>Great post Brian - I&#039;m excited to keep the momentum for this event moving forward and continuing to work with such a high quality group of people to make this happen.  I only wish I could have participated in the last meeting in person!  I&#039;ll definitely try to make the next one.  As I was reading over your post, I had another thought about the workshop presenters/speakers we&#039;re targeting - what if we reached outside of government for one of these sessions?  At the recent Web 2.0 Summit, they had a panel with a bunch of teenagers talking about technology and how they use it and another panel with Mark Cuban and Brooke Burke talking about how they used social media.  They were a welcome change from the rest of the VERY heavy tech insiders&#039; focus of the rest of the sessions, but it also offered some valuable perspectives that forced the attendees to look at things through a different lens.  

What if one of the workshops brought together people from different industries for a panel discussion about what THEY want out of their government and government 2.0?  I think it&#039;d be interesting to have a session where we talked about the challenges and opportunities of Gov 2.0 with people outside the government who have been successful in transforming something in their own industries.  There are enough VERY successful folks local to the Washington area (or travel here frequently) who might be willing to participate.  I think they might be able to bring a fresh and unique perspective to this notion of Government 2.0.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Brian &#8211; I&#8217;m excited to keep the momentum for this event moving forward and continuing to work with such a high quality group of people to make this happen.  I only wish I could have participated in the last meeting in person!  I&#8217;ll definitely try to make the next one.  As I was reading over your post, I had another thought about the workshop presenters/speakers we&#8217;re targeting &#8211; what if we reached outside of government for one of these sessions?  At the recent Web 2.0 Summit, they had a panel with a bunch of teenagers talking about technology and how they use it and another panel with Mark Cuban and Brooke Burke talking about how they used social media.  They were a welcome change from the rest of the VERY heavy tech insiders&#8217; focus of the rest of the sessions, but it also offered some valuable perspectives that forced the attendees to look at things through a different lens.  </p>
<p>What if one of the workshops brought together people from different industries for a panel discussion about what THEY want out of their government and government 2.0?  I think it&#8217;d be interesting to have a session where we talked about the challenges and opportunities of Gov 2.0 with people outside the government who have been successful in transforming something in their own industries.  There are enough VERY successful folks local to the Washington area (or travel here frequently) who might be willing to participate.  I think they might be able to bring a fresh and unique perspective to this notion of Government 2.0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Government 2.0 #Win? by uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://briandrake.wordpress.com/2009/10/31/government-2-0-win/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 00:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briandrake.wordpress.com/?p=605#comment-208</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by govwiki: RT The next iteration in the Government 2.0 #fail conference #gov2 #gov20 http://wp.me/ppJEg-9L http://bit.ly/3KkEPG...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by govwiki: RT The next iteration in the Government 2.0 #fail conference #gov2 #gov20 <a href="http://wp.me/ppJEg-9L" rel="nofollow">http://wp.me/ppJEg-9L</a> <a href="http://bit.ly/3KkEPG.." rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/3KkEPG..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Government 2.0 #FAIL by Upcoming on Gov 2.0 Radio &#124; 9 p.m. EST Sundays &#171; Adriel Hampton</title>
		<link>http://briandrake.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/government-2-0-fail/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>Upcoming on Gov 2.0 Radio &#124; 9 p.m. EST Sundays &#171; Adriel Hampton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 21:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briandrake.wordpress.com/?p=577#comment-207</guid>
		<description>[...] retired career fed Stephen Buckley and collaboration consultant Brian Drake. Drake is planning the Government 2.0 #FAIL workshop, while Buckley, who in the &#8217;90s managed a 1,000 member &#8220;Reinventing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] retired career fed Stephen Buckley and collaboration consultant Brian Drake. Drake is planning the Government 2.0 #FAIL workshop, while Buckley, who in the &#8217;90s managed a 1,000 member &#8220;Reinventing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Government 2.0 #FAIL by Upcoming on Gov 2.0 Radio &#124; 9 p.m. EST Sundays &#171; Uniting Progressives on the Social Web</title>
		<link>http://briandrake.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/government-2-0-fail/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>Upcoming on Gov 2.0 Radio &#124; 9 p.m. EST Sundays &#171; Uniting Progressives on the Social Web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 21:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briandrake.wordpress.com/?p=577#comment-206</guid>
		<description>[...] retired career fed Stephen Buckley and collaboration consultant Brian Drake. Drake is planning the Government 2.0 #FAIL workshop, while Buckley, who in the &#8217;90s managed a 1,000 member &#8220;Reinventing [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] retired career fed Stephen Buckley and collaboration consultant Brian Drake. Drake is planning the Government 2.0 #FAIL workshop, while Buckley, who in the &#8217;90s managed a 1,000 member &#8220;Reinventing [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
